Re: SVG IG Torture tests

Hi, Wade-

G. Wade Johnson wrote (on 2/7/10 4:45 PM):
> Now taking the list in a completely different direction, I've got a
> question on the torture tests.
>
> I stumbled across an issue with (at least) radial gradients that is
> different between different browsers/viewers. It's not exactly a
> "torture test", but it is a good compatibility test.

That sounds perfect as a start on a set of practical tests.


> Do we have a preferred form for this kind of test?
>
> I was thinking of an HTML page with variants of the SVG listed on the
> left and PNGs with the expected output on the right, labeled
> appropriately. Does that match other people's expectations? Should each
> variant have it's own HTML page? Do we have any suggestions on
> standardized naming, yet?
>
> If there are no defined approaches yet, I'll probably toss my examples
> into svgtorture, assuming we'll move things around as consensus gels.

My suggestion would be to simply put whatever you have up there.  We can 
always change the format later, what we need is the meat of the tests.

Regards-
-Doug Schepers
W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs

Received on Sunday, 7 February 2010 23:30:39 UTC