W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-svg-ig@w3.org > October to December 2008

RE: Planet SVG: The layout

From: Dailey, David P. <david.dailey@sru.edu>
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 21:39:36 -0500
Message-ID: <1835D662B263BC4E864A7CFAB2FEEB3D0152568D@msfexch01.srunet.sruad.edu>
To: "Ruud Steltenpool" <svg@steltenpower.com>, "Manuel Strehl" <svg@manuel-strehl.de>
Cc: <public-svg-ig@w3.org>

Yes the page as suggested looks good to me. (orange and black have never been my favorites , but they work rather well with the logo ).
 
The plain SVG page doesn't seem to load (giving an error message of Error creating thumbnail: convert: unable to open image `pattern2582': No such file or directory.
convert: Non-conforming drawing primitive definition `fill'. ) in the three browsers I tested. But the png version looks good!
 
David

________________________________

From: public-svg-ig-request@w3.org on behalf of Ruud Steltenpool
Sent: Tue 11/11/2008 2:36 PM
To: Manuel Strehl
Cc: public-svg-ig@w3.org
Subject: Re: Planet SVG: The layout




Thanks Manuel,

Looks nice
And as the default Drupal thing gives a not-ready/dead/unprofessional
impression, i'd say put it in place soon.
Also, a favicon please.

gruessen

Ruud



Manuel Strehl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was fiddling with some ideas on how planetsvg.com could look like. An
> important point was, that I wanted to embed the SVG logo as centered
> style element.
>
> So my current draft landed on the SVG IG wiki:
> <http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/IG/wiki/Image:Planet.svg> (rastered
> version: <http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/IG/wiki/Image:Planet.svg.png>)
>
> It is, like said, a draft. Especially has a final layout to respect the
> decissions to be made towards the site structure. E.g., I think, a
> second level navigation should be introduced somewhere.
>
> However, comments are highly appreciated...
>
> Best,
> Manuel
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 12 November 2008 14:49:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 14 April 2009 16:29:30 GMT