Re: [SVG] graphics-doc role should be graphics-document (ARIA has avoided inconsistent abbreviation)

I am fine with changing it but with the prefix it is a mouthful. Now would be the time to change it. We can post it like does anyone object to the name change and just do it if no objections. I don't want to take meeting time for that.

Rich

Rich

Sent from my iPhone

> On Apr 28, 2016, at 9:34 PM, Amelia Bellamy-Royds <amelia.bellamy.royds@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> If there is consensus on the main ARIA working group to go with the longer name, I don't have a problem with that.  In the SVG Accessibility Task Force, we did discuss a number of variations on the name and settled on graphics-doc as a compromise between concise and comprehensible.
> 
> I would ask for a quick resolution, though (i.e., comments on mailing list this week & discussion at the next ARIA telcon), so we can update all the specs sooner rather than later, and definitely before the next heartbeat drafts.
> 
> ~Amelia
> 
>> On 28 April 2016 at 19:14, James Craig <jcraig@apple.com> wrote:
>> While reviewing a related thread, I noticed the "graphics-doc" role should be "graphics-document"... With the unfortunate exception of the "img" role (I admit missing this), ARIA has avoided inconsistent abbreviation.
>> 
>> http://www.w3.org/TR/graphics-aria-1.0/#graphics-doc
> 

Received on Friday, 29 April 2016 03:36:37 UTC