W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-speech-api@w3.org > September 2012

Re: use some kind of issue tracking tool to manage spec changes?

From: Glen Shires <gshires@google.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 09:49:38 -0700
Message-ID: <CAEE5bcjii=jDaB_B3_2E--1Cz+FXs6H-ad2mFhFZ19C1+DEVOA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Matt Womer <mdw@w3.org>
Cc: Deborah Dahl <dahl@conversational-technologies.com>, olli@pettay.fi, public-speech-api@w3.org
All,
Looks like the issue tracking system is up and running. Please feel free to
add issues that need to be tracked. Please include URLs to relevant mailing
list discussions.

Thanks Matt for setting this up!
/Glen Shires


On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 7:17 AM, Matt Womer <mdw@w3.org> wrote:

> Hi Glenn and all,
>
> I setup:
>
> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/describecomponents.cgi?product=Speech%20API
>
> I took some liberty with it, as you have to create a component when you
> create the product, so I just did "Speech API" and "Documents of the Speech
> API Community Group" again.  It also required a default assignee, which
> right now I set to you Glen :)  I think that's editable without any team
> access, but if it's not I'll change it to whomever we want.
>
> -M
>
> On Sep 12, 2012, at 11:08 AM, Glen Shires <gshires@google.com> wrote:
>
> > Matt,
> > How do we setup "Speech API" as a product under bugzilla, with the
> description "Documents of the Speech API Community Group" ?
> >
> > /Glen Shires
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 6:53 AM, Deborah Dahl <
> dahl@conversational-technologies.com> wrote:
> > I think bugzilla would also work. I have more experience with Tracker,
> but I
> > know a lot of groups have been satisfied with bugzilla.
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Olli Pettay [mailto:Olli.Pettay@helsinki.fi]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 9:51 AM
> > > To: Deborah Dahl
> > > Cc: public-speech-api@w3.org
> > > Subject: Re: use some kind of issue tracking tool to manage spec
> changes?
> > >
> > > On 09/12/2012 03:44 PM, Deborah Dahl wrote:
> > > > I think it's hard to follow all the discussion on this list just by
> > using the
> > > mailing list archive. I propose that we use some sort of tracking/issue
> > > > tool. Personally, I think the W3C Tracker tool would be fine.
> > > >
> > >
> > > I agree using a bug tracker for resolving issues could be nice.
> > >
> > > W3C has bugzilla, which is way more nicer for issue tracking than
> Tracker,
> > and
> > > it lets also non-group-members to file bugs.
> > > WebApps, HTML, etc use bugzilla.
> > > https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -Olli
> >
> >
> >
>
>
Received on Thursday, 13 September 2012 16:50:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:02:28 UTC