W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-speech-api@w3.org > June 2012

RE: The SpeechRecognition.maxNBest attribute

From: Young, Milan <Milan.Young@nuance.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 17:00:47 +0000
To: Hans Wennborg <hwennborg@google.com>
CC: Satish S <satish@google.com>, "olli@pettay.fi" <olli@pettay.fi>, "public-speech-api@w3.org" <public-speech-api@w3.org>
Message-ID: <B236B24082A4094A85003E8FFB8DDC3C1A475163@SOM-EXCH04.nuance.com>
Good question.  But unfortunately the answer is correlated to our "Confidence property" thread which is currently unresolved.  

I suggest putting in some sort of issue marker and revisiting when confidenceThreshold has been resolved.

Thanks


-----Original Message-----
From: Hans Wennborg [mailto:hwennborg@google.com] 
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2012 3:51 AM
To: Young, Milan
Cc: Satish S; olli@pettay.fi; public-speech-api@w3.org
Subject: Re: The SpeechRecognition.maxNBest attribute

On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Hans Wennborg <hwennborg@google.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 9:17 PM, Young, Milan <Milan.Young@nuance.com> wrote:
>> Good to know.  'unsigned long' it is.
>
> Thanks all, I updated the spec draft in
> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/speech-api/rev/01a1cd9b6ef6
>
> Thanks,
> Hans

I almost forgot the question about 0. What do we want to do when maxAlternatives = 0? Ignore it? Declare it an error? Interpret it as "no maximum, please return all alternatives"? I'd prefer the last one.

Thanks,
Hans
Received on Thursday, 21 June 2012 17:01:34 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 21 June 2012 17:01:35 GMT