- From: Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org>
- Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2017 13:08:29 +0100
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com>, public-sparql-exists@w3.org
On 31/03/17 15:10, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > On 03/23/2017 08:11 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote: >> https://w3c.github.io/sparql-exists/docs/sparql-exists.html >> >> I've made some updates to reflect recent discussions and also to add >> descriptive text. What I'd really like feedback on is where less can be >> said. Just adding text to explain points risks putting too much in. >> >> Andy > > I see that some changes have been made. These changes appear to be an attempt > to fix some problems that I have pointed out. However, I don't think that > there has been any description of how the changes fix these problems. > > It may be that the final report can be somewhat sparse, but I would have > thought that at least there should be some record in the group mailing list > explaining how any final solution addresses the problems pointed out along the > way. The changes reflect the discussion here, including your suggestion on projection. > Producing and making changes to a report that indicated that it was the > consensus of the community group without first getting consensus of the group > is not a good idea. > I have cut down this claim in the abstract and added > wording to the effect that there are two proposals in the report. Please check the markup after making changes. I have fixed the broken HTML this time. > > > peter >
Received on Monday, 3 April 2017 12:09:04 UTC