- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2016 13:47:40 -0700
- To: james anderson <james@dydra.com>, public-sparql-dev@w3.org
On 07/01/2016 01:34 PM, james anderson wrote: > good evening; > >> On 2016-06-30, at 15:05, Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com >> <mailto:pfpschneider@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> On 06/30/2016 04:50 AM, Axel Polleres wrote: >>> Dear Andy, >>> >>> [...] >>> >>> I have to admit I couldn't follow the whole discussion but is there a >>> mail/link which summarizes the issues (I am aware of the bnode injection >>> issue, which more there are?) >>> >>> Thanks & best regards, >>> Axel >> >> Hi Axel: >> >> I don't think that there is an email that is exactly what you asked for so I >> have tried to put together a simple list of problems with EXISTS. The first >> two problems are directly problems with the spec. The last three are cases >> where the spec produces what can be considered to be counterintuitive results >> and some implementations diverge from the spec. >> >> […] > > note that, in the issue descriptions which followed, the conclusions are > subject to discussion, as they follow from interpretations of the > recommendation which are not universal. > > best regards, from berlin, Which conclusions and interpretations of the recommendation are not universal in this message? peter
Received on Friday, 1 July 2016 20:48:15 UTC