W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sparql-dev@w3.org > October to December 2015


From: james anderson <james@dydra.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2015 11:33:51 +0000
Cc: public-sparql-dev@w3.org
Message-ID: <0000015153053cf8-2a12c4bf-ad46-4297-91c5-37620dd6cad1-000000@eu-west-1.amazonses.com>
To: Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org>
good morning;

> On 2015-11-29, at 11:33, Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org> wrote:
> […]
>> Is there any theoretical or technical obstacle to this?
> There's no obstacle.  A Google Summer of Code project added this to Apache Jena this year and it'll be in the next release.
> It follows the design you gave:
> https://jena.apache.org/documentation/query/construct-quad.html

while a quite reasonable extension proposal and one which leads one to wonder why it was left out of the 1.1 recommendation, there are questions.
- what identifier does arq intend to us in the service description to indicate its support
- as a matter of interoperability, is the elided graph case in the “complete form” example really in instance of the grammar which appears later in the document? given the example, this reader would have expected a production of the form
   ( 'GRAPH’ )? VarOrIri '{' TriplesTemplate? ‘}’
- which end does the elision serve?

best regards, from berlin,
james anderson | james@dydra.com | http://dydra.com
Received on Sunday, 29 November 2015 11:34:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sunday, 29 November 2015 11:34:25 UTC