- From: Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org>
- Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 14:04:00 +0100
- To: Gary King <garywarrenking@gmail.com>, Bob MacGregor <bob.macgregor@gmail.com>
- CC: public-sparql-dev@w3.org
On 21/07/15 13:35, Gary King wrote: > Thanks Andy and Bob, > > My plan was indeed to go with SPARQL/JSON output for the reasons you suggest. Is there a move afoot to switch SPARQL/XML to XML 1.1 in some future version? In Jena or for the W3C specs? For Jena - send a pull request - at a guess, changes to XMLOutputResultSet. Some &# encoding and setting 1.1. Reading devolves to For efficiency and streaming reasons, the writer is directly outputing XML. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-942 for workarounds for the Java/STaX issue. For the W3C specs - no plans as far as I know. W3C haven't hinted at anything. The most there is an errata process. An agreement amongst users and implementers (stores and client libraries) to deal with XML 1.0/1.1 is probably the way to go. There is talk of a community activity to maintain the (RDF|SPARQL) tests. Andy > >> There is a real raw control-Z in that line (which is illegal in XML 1.0). It just displays as a space character in some fonts. if I cut&paste the line into emacs it displays as ^Z. > > Ah, my bad. Thanks for catching that. > >> Emit XML 1.1 if you need to. > > Okay. > > thanks again, > -- > Gary Warren King, metabang.com > Cell: (413) 559 8738 > Fax: (206) 338-4052 > gwkkwg on Skype * garethsan on AIM * gwking on twitter >
Received on Tuesday, 21 July 2015 13:04:35 UTC