W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sparql-dev@w3.org > October to December 2010

Re: boolean shorthand for common optional/union patterns

From: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 17:07:09 +0100
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=s8UC68rP9PkV1o1NNLjoeDW=afTzKFhcUXDwV@mail.gmail.com>
To: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
Cc: public-sparql-dev@w3.org
On 6 December 2010 19:13, Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net> wrote:
> Hi Danny,
> You may be interested in the property paths feature which is in the SPARQL
> 1.1 Query drafts. Please take a look at:
> http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-query/#propertypaths

Right...first example even :)

Before shuffling back out again I'll just note that the use of
booleans isn't "a new query language" as dajobe describe property
paths, just a sweetener for the current syntax - may be pertinent if
the spec gets modularised.

Thanks Lee.


Received on Tuesday, 7 December 2010 16:07:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:15:50 UTC