Re: changing literal values with CONSTRUCT

Hey Damian,

Thanks for the prompt reply.
As long as there is no decision on ISSUE-57 by the SPARQL WG it seems I have 
to live with the sub-query solution.

Thanks,
Olaf

On Saturday 21 August 2010 09:32:51 Damian Steer wrote:
> On 21 Aug 2010, at 09:20, Damian Steer wrote:
> > [1] <http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Feature:Assignment>
> > [2] <http://jena.sourceforge.net/ARQ/assignment.html>
> 
> Issue was not linked in wiki (that I could see):
> 
> <http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/issues/57>
> 
> Damian