W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sparql-dev@w3.org > January to March 2010

Re: Suggestion on modifying update in SPARQL 1.1.

From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 07:32:43 -0400
Message-ID: <4BA20F5B.7010705@thefigtrees.net>
To: Nikolai Anissimov <anisimov@fiztech-usa.net>
CC: public-sparql-dev@w3.org, anisimov@computer.org
Hello Nikolay,

Please send all feedback regarding SPARQL 1.1 to the Working Group's 
comments list at public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org.

many thanks,
Lee

On 3/17/2010 4:02 PM, Nikolai Anissimov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm reading a proposal SPARQL 1.1/Update (http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/update-1.1/gen.html#t413).
> My impression that DELETE/INSERT construct is incomplete. I suggest to add to this construct SELECT. It will use the same WHERE as DELETE and INSERT simultaneously. One could use it for returning results about execution of update which are intreseted for application.
> Now the construct will look like:
>
> # UPDATE outline syntax : general form:
> [ WITH<uri>  ]
> SELECT {...}
> DELETE { modify_template [ modify_template ]* }
> INSERT { modify_template [ modify_template ]* }
> WHERE GroupGraphPattern
>
> One can specify what was added/deleted to RDF database.
> One more benefit is it would clarify what to return back after updating.
>
> Reagards,
> Nikolay Anisimov
> Software Architect at FrontRange Solutions
> Email: anisimov@computer.org
>
>
>
>
Received on Thursday, 18 March 2010 11:33:23 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 18 March 2010 11:33:23 GMT