W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sparql-dev@w3.org > January to March 2010

Re: rev and the costs of inverses/aliases in SPARQL

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2010 11:43:40 -0600
To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Cc: public-sparql-dev <public-sparql-dev@w3.org>, public-rdfa <public-rdfa@w3.org>
Message-ID: <1268070220.3952.6013.camel@pav.lan>
On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 17:41 +0100, Ivan Herman wrote:
[...]
> Which unnecessarily complicates the structure.

OK, those examples help.

This sort of generality is less helpful:

> There is another issue. There is already deployed RDFa out there. Quite
> a lot, actually.

If you could give a few examples, that would make the case much
more strongly.

>  As a consequence, there is a strong requirement of
> backward compatibility in the RDFa WG charter. This also means that if
> the @rev is removed from the core HTML5 document, RDFa will have it
> alongside the RDFa specific attributes like @about or @resource...

My understanding is that there's just one design that
W3C is working on for RDFa in text/html; it will either have @rev
or it will not.


-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 8 March 2010 17:43:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 8 March 2010 17:43:44 GMT