W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sparql-dev@w3.org > April to June 2008

Re: Bug in SPARQL grammar?

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 02 May 2008 09:01:27 -0500
To: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
Cc: public-sparql-comments@w3.org, public-sparql-dev@w3.org
Message-Id: <1209736887.4651.320.camel@pav.lan> 

On Fri, 2008-05-02 at 14:55 +0100, Axel Polleres wrote:
[...]
> Note: No qnames are allowed here in the type position, although
>        qnames like xs:integer *are* actually used for typed literals in
>        the examples in the SPARQL document.

odd... at some point, I thought we had all the examples
machine-checked against the grammar.

> I assume this is a bug?

Looks like it to me.

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Friday, 2 May 2008 14:01:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 2 May 2008 14:01:50 GMT