RE: Requesting i18n review for ActivityPub

Thanks!

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christopher Allan Webber [mailto:cwebber@dustycloud.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2016 2:18 PM
> To: www-international@w3.org
> Cc: public-socialweb@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Requesting i18n review for ActivityPub
> 
> And foolishly, I forgot the link to the spec!
> 
> Latest editor's draft:
>   https://w3c-social.github.io/activitypub/

> 
>  - Chris
> 
> Christopher Allan Webber writes:
> 
> > Hello,
> >
> > ActivityPub is aiming to enter Candidate Recommendation by the 11th,
> > and we'd like to request a review for any potential i18n issues.
> > ActivityPub is a client to server (eg mobile applications, desktop
> > applications, etc) and server to server (federation) standard for
> > propagating social network activity through the web.
> >
> > I've gone through the checklist... I don't personally anticipate much
> > to be flagged that hasn't already been so for ActivityStreams, on
> > which ActivityPub heavily relies.  ActivityPub uses ActivityStreams
> > for its vocabulary and serialization mechanism (via json-ld), which
> > has already gone through i18n review.  Aside from that, most of what
> > ActivityPub specifies is endpoints to which ActivityStreams objects
> > may be submitted.
> >
> > Any and all feedback is welcome.  Thank you!
> >
> >  - Christopher Allan Webber,
> >    on behalf of ActivityPub and the Social WG
>

Received on Wednesday, 28 September 2016 12:49:28 UTC