Re: Requesting an accessibility review for ActivityPub

Christopher, All:

APA has reviewed the ActivityPub specification and found no issues from
an accessibility point of view. Our activity on your document is logged
in our Spec Review Wiki at:

https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/wiki/ActivityPub

My apologies for our slow response to your review request.

Janina Sajka, APA Chair



Christopher Allan Webber writes:
> Christopher Allan Webber writes:
> 
> > Hello,
> >
> > ActivityPub is aiming to enter Candidate Recommendation by the 11th, and
> > we'd like to request a review for any potential accessibility issues.
> > ActivityPub is a client to server (eg mobile applications, desktop
> > applications, etc) and server to server (federation) standard for
> > propagating social network activity through the web.
> >
> > In sum, ActivityPub uses ActivityStreams 2.0 as its vocabulary and
> > serialization mechanism (via json-ld), and primarily defines a mechanism
> > for discovering and submitting activities to endpoints, as well as
> > expected side effects for various activity types.
> 
> And I once again forgot the link to the editor's draft.  Apologies!
> 
> You can find it here:
>   https://w3c-social.github.io/activitypub/
> 
> > Any and all feedback is welcome.  Thank you!
> >
> >  - Christopher Allan Webber,
> >    on behalf of ActivityPub and the Social WG

-- 

Janina Sajka,	Phone:	+1.443.300.2200
			sip:janina@asterisk.rednote.net
		Email:	janina@rednote.net

Linux Foundation Fellow
Executive Chair, Accessibility Workgroup:	http://a11y.org

The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI)
Chair, Accessible Platform Architectures	http://www.w3.org/wai/apa

Received on Tuesday, 18 October 2016 19:42:50 UTC