Re: Example of discussion representation

On 22 September 2015 at 11:49, Renato Iannella <renato@knowledgeflux.com>
wrote:

>
> On 17 Sep 2015, at 4:07 pm, Renato Iannella <renato@knowledgeflux.com>
> wrote:
>
> I just wanted to confirm (or not) my understanding of using AS to
> represent a typical discussion on a social network.
>
>
> Let me then rephrase the question…
>
> Will/Can there be examples created for the Requirements (based on the
> approved user stories):
>

"Approved" is a mis-characterization.  It was a analysis based on some of
the voting, in a rather arbitrary, way.  The user stories are not a
deliverable of the WG, just a guide.  The voting is a guide too.  There is
an emphasis on what is implemented.


>
>   http://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/Social_API/Requirements
>
> This will help people understand and apply the AS specs to their use cases.
>

This wiki page is simply that, whoever has time to contribute can help
shape the requirements.  So far, it's been mainly Amy, but WG member that
has time to contribute is welcome to take the user stories and
implementations [1] as an input, to help create a working draft for a
social API.  Help in this area would be quite welcome, as the deliverable
is about a year behind the time line in the charter.

[1] https://github.com/w3c-social/social-ucr


>
> *Renato Iannella*
> *Head of Innovation and Emerging Technologies, **KnowledgeFlux*
> Level 7, 100 Edward St, Brisbane 4000 AUSTRALIA +61 4 1313 2206
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>