- From: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 01:35:43 -0400
- To: public-socialweb@w3.org
Usually when faced with writing the first draft of a FPWD, it requires
having a rough draft of some pre-existing work. Now, given that we are
blessed with three pre-existing designs and that after the Paris F2F the
various people are seeing the core similarities/differences, would now
be a good time to see if a joint draft between the three candidates
could be produced, with one or two neutral editors.
Would Tysekia, Aaron, and someone from SoLiD be up for it?
Any opinions? Volunteers?
Positive: It would force each of the similarities/differences to be
worked out one by one. For example:
Micropub - form-encoding and extensibility
SoLiD - Working with ActivityStreams
Negative: Might create a "Frankenstein" monster that no-one will implement.
My advise to avoid the negative would be to use the user-stories to
guide us and 'pave the cowpaths' in existing specs where there are
similarities, keeping the spec minimalistic.
cheers,
harry
Received on Tuesday, 12 May 2015 05:35:46 UTC