- From: ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>
- Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2015 17:23:47 +0200
- To: public-socialweb@w3.org
On 04/25/2015 11:14 AM, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ wrote: > Ahoy o/ > > I just tidied up page for Comparison and added it to agenda of next telecon > https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/2015-04-28#Comparison > > IMO we suffer a lot lack of understanding between IndieWeb, LinkedData > and Activity Streams 1.0 way of modeling data. I hope we can take > advantage also during our Face 2 Face to build some more common > understanding. But first we need to document similarities and > differences little better. I proposed starting with those most relevant > to our Social API work > > * Microformats & RDF > * Microformats JSON & Microformats JSON-LD > * Microformats 2 & Activity_Streams 2 I also added to next telecon agenda Social API, Endpoint Comparison https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/2015-04-28#Endpoint_Comparison * MicropubEndpoint & ldp:Resource * WebmentionEndpoint & ldp:Resource Please also notice my relevant proposals for F2F Agenda about "Describing and discovering API endpoints" https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/2015-05-04#Agenda o/
Received on Saturday, 25 April 2015 15:23:55 UTC