- From: ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>
- Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 20:21:42 +0100
- To: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>, public-socialweb@w3.org
- CC: 'Renato Iannella' <ri@semanticidentity.com>
On 10/30/2014 08:13 PM, Markus Lanthaler wrote: > On 28 Okt 2014 at 01:36, Renato Iannella wrote: >> >>> On 24 Oct 2014, at 22:59, Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net> > wrote: >>> >>> Now that has technical consequences... namely more HTTP requests, lower >>> cache-hit rates, etc. What's the reasoning behind your suggestion to use >>> distinct resources instead of fragment identifiers? >> >> There are always tradeoffs between the two approaches: >> http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp- vocab-pub/ > > Right. I was actually interested what you tried to optimize for when you > suggested to use paths instead of fragment identifiers. I suggested to use > fragment identifiers because I expect the vocabulary to be (and remain) > quite small and I wanted to minimize the number of necessary HTTP requests. FYI http://socialwg.indiewebcamp.com/irc/social/2014-10-27/line/1414433862098 RESOLVED: adoption of "http://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#" as namespace for Activity Streams 2.0
Received on Thursday, 30 October 2014 19:23:54 UTC