While I hesitate to engage with a rather toxic thread ... > > 2. Schema.org alone is not sufficient for our use cases > I don't see that this is relevant. In Linked Data it is enormously easy to > supplement in cases where the base is found lacking. > It is relevant because while it is enormously easy in Linked Data due to the ease of generating distinct namespaces, schema.org lacks this by design. Rob -- Rob Sanderson Technology Collaboration Facilitator Digital Library Systems and Services Stanford, CA 94305
Received on Monday, 10 November 2014 21:46:12 UTC