RE: Social networking block diagram activity moves to the Social Business Community Group

Speaking for myself, I think we need to consider the whole social spectrum -- business, public and martian. Especially since the boundaries are increasingly blurred. The only distinction I might make would be to identify any technologies that are specifically pertinent to a specific usage, if there are any.

  -- Ann



-----Original Message-----
From: Evan Prodromou [mailto:evan@status.net] 
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2012 7:57 AM
To: Jeff Jaffe
Cc: public-socialweb@w3.org; internal-socbizcg@w3.org; Rich Rogers/Raleigh/IBM
Subject: Re: Social networking block diagram activity moves to the Social Business Community Group

On 06/07/2012 09:40 AM, Jeff Jaffe wrote:
> This is to announce to the Social networking task force that the 
> Social Business Community Group [1] has accepted to be the place for 
> follow-up work on the Social networking block diagram [2], per their 
> chair Rich Rogers.  Those interested in continuing those discussions 
> are welcome to join the CG, as I have done today.
>
> Jeff
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/community/socbizcg/
> [2] http://www.w3.org/wiki/SocialWebHeadlightsTaskForce
>
Will we still be considering consumer social web issues in the document? 
Or are we going to explicitly leave those out?

-Evan

--
Evan Prodromou, CEO and Founder, StatusNet Inc.
1124 rue Marie-Anne Est #32, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H2J 2B7
E: evan@status.net P: +1-514-554-3826

Received on Thursday, 7 June 2012 16:05:32 UTC