W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-social-web-talk@w3.org > January 2009

Re: Poll: Who would join Social Web XG(s)? 1 or 2 XGs? Telecons?

From: Joaquin Salvachua <jsr@dit.upm.es>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 12:49:01 +0100
Message-Id: <B91064AC-E78E-4E95-8D5B-891E8DE84A09@dit.upm.es>
Cc: public-social-web-talk@w3.org
To: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>
Hello,


El 23/01/2009, a las 17:43, Harry Halpin escribió:

>
> Two quick questions - please respond to list if possible!
>
> 1) Who would join the Social Web XG? Please add if you are a W3C  
> member
> or not, and if your organization would join W3C.
>


Yes, and UPM is a member.


> 2) Would you prefer one or two XGs? One XG focused on interoperability
> between exisiting work on the social web, and another focused on Best
> Practices? Or should these be done as one XG?
>

Perhaps 2 XG may be better, since may help to focus a bit more.

> 3) Regardless of one or two XGs, different telecons but same  
> listserv to
> facilitate communication? Or one telecon?
>

i think one telecom will be better .

Best regards   and waiting for a wonderfull collaboration

Joaquín Salvachúa

> I'm trying to get a head count here.
>
>     thanks,
>
>           -harry
>






------------------------------------------------------------------------
Joaquin Salvachua               tel: +34 91 549 57 00  x.3056
Associated Professor                 +34 91 549 57 62  x.3056
dpt. Telematica                                                  
Change  ^
E.T.S.I. Telecomunicacion
Ciudad Universitaria S/N         fax: +34 91 336 73 33
E-28040  MADRID   SPAIN

mailto:jsalvachua@dit.upm.es // http://www.dit.upm.es/~jsr
Blog: http://jsalvachua.blogspot.com/
------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
--
Received on Friday, 30 January 2009 11:51:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:51:47 UTC