W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-social-web-talk@w3.org > January 2009

Re: Poll: Who would join Social Web XG(s)? 1 or 2 XGs? Telecons?

From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 18:57:31 +0100
Message-ID: <497A050B.209@danbri.org>
To: Karl Dubost <karl+w3c@la-grange.net>
Cc: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>, public-social-web-talk@w3.org

On 23/1/09 18:37, Karl Dubost wrote:
> Le 23 janv. 2009 à 11:43, Harry Halpin a écrit :
>> 1) Who would join the Social Web XG? Please add if you are a W3C member
>> or not, and if your organization would join W3C.
> I would join this XG (if I find an employer who is W3C Member or a an
> employer who would be in favor of joining W3C)

To be clear, is this just so you have the resources/support you need to 
be effective and useful in the group?

I have no assumption that W3C Membership should be a precondition for 
participation in the XG(s). A public list that the public are welcome to 
participate in, and telecons open to those without member affiliation 
too. I don't care quite how this is cludged/managed in terms of W3C 
process; but I really think we'll get nowhere if the partipation model 
excludes those many people working outside of W3C.

Is anyone proposing a Membership-based participation model?



Received on Friday, 23 January 2009 17:58:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:51:47 UTC