- From: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 16:25:23 +0100
- To: "Bassetti, Ann" <ann.bassetti@boeing.com>, Daniel Harris <daniel@kendra.org.uk>, "public-social-interest@w3.org" <public-social-interest@w3.org>
On 02/09/2015 09:29 PM, Bassetti, Ann wrote: > wow, good catch, Daniel! Just an oversight, AFAIK. I just changed the title of the IG page, but don't have time right now to go digging for other instances. Feel free to edit anything you think is incorrect. > Perhaps Ann and others in the IG missed this conversation, so I'll repeat it - not sure if it went out or happened purely during the AC charter review. At bequest of our former chair, Mark Crawford, we called it the "Social Interest Group" when weinsofar as it's domain was all possible social applicatons, some of which may not involve the "Web" (i.e. use of HTTP, URIs, etc.). In particular, I think Mark was interested in Internet of Things use-cases. Thus there is no mistake. You guys in the Social Interest Group have *all social interactions in any technology*. It's big shoes to fill, but we know you can do it! cheers, harry > Thanks! -- Ann > > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Daniel Harris [mailto:daniel@kendra.org.uk] >> Sent: Monday, February 09, 2015 12:23 PM >> To: public-social-interest@w3.org >> Subject: Naming for Social Web groups... >> >> Dear All, >> >> I note that there seems to be a naming pattern mismatch for the Social Web >> groups. >> >> If you take a look at: >> https://www.w3.org/wiki/Social >> You'll see "Social Web Interest Group" clearly stated but when you land at: >> https://www.w3.org/wiki/SocialIG >> You see "Social Interest Group" everywhere with no "Web". >> >> Just wondering why this is so and wondering if we are preparing to build >> standards then why is naming seemingly non-standard. >> >> Can anyone shed some light on this? >> >> Cheers Daniel >
Received on Tuesday, 10 February 2015 15:25:35 UTC