Hi Matthew, I'm taking on Derek's ACTION-262 as I said I would do. On 12/13/11 5:18 PM, Matthew Golby-Kirk wrote: > All, > > Under Action-247 [1] I have reviewed the test suite for SOAP-JMS. All > tests are already marked as "*Optional*" or "*Required*", which is > good, but a few tests appear to be marked incorrectly. > > *test0008 *is marked as *Optional *but I believe it should be marked > as *Required *as the client will always have an environment in which > it is running. However, if we decide this should remain *Optional*, > then *test0017 *should also become *Optional *as this test also > requires the use of the client environment. I conclude that test0017 should be optional, because there's no normative requirement in the specification that a client must support an "environment" that affects the configuration of the JMS binding for SOAP. So I don't think we can require this test. > > *test0009 *is marked as *Required*, but I believe it should be marked > as *Optional *as it uses WSDL 1.1 properties like *test0006 *which is > already marked as an *Optional *test. > > *test0010 *is marked as *Required*, but I believe it should be marked > as *Optional *as it uses WSDL 1.1 properties like *test0006 *which is > already marked as an *Optional *test. > > *test0018 *is marked as *Required*, but I believe it should be marked > as *Optional *as it requires the use of a topic which I understand is > *Optional *in the spec. > > *test0019 *is marked as *Required*, but I believe it should be marked > as *Optional *as it requires the use of a topic which I understand is > *Optional *in the spec. Agreed. -Eric. > > > Kind Regards, > > Matthew > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/actions/247Received on Monday, 20 February 2012 22:17:44 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 20 February 2012 22:17:44 GMT