W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-soap-jms@w3.org > September 2011

RE: ACTION-253: proposal for new SOTD

From: Rokicki, Derek <Derek.Rokicki@softwareag.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 23:17:16 -0400
Message-ID: <173583B35C32FD48B3114FB1122C3FEF05354F2B@resmsg04.AME.ad.sag>
To: "Yves Lafon" <ylafon@w3.org>
Cc: <public-soap-jms@w3.org>
Yves,

Here is an updated version of the Status of this Document section. This version incorporates your suggestions and it is in conformance with the Technical Report Publication Policy (almost).  

I still have a few questions...

1) SOTD must include the end date of the review period. What is this date?

2) SOTD must include either: a link to an interoperability or implementation report if the Director used such a report as part of the decision to advance the specification, or a statement that the Director's decision did not involve such a report. Do we have such a report?

3) SOTD must provide information to Advisory Committee Representatives about how to send their review comments (e.g., a link to a WBS review form). What is the link to our WSB review form?


<h2>Status of this Document</h2>

<p>This section describes the status of this document at the time of its publication. Other documents may supersede this document. A list of current W3C publications and the latest revision of this technical report can be found in the W3C technical reports index at <a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/">http://www.w3.org/TR/</a>.</p>

</p>This is the <a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#cfr">Proposed Recommendation</a> of the SOAP over Java Message Service 1.0 specification. It has been produced by the <a href=" http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/">SOAP-JMS Binding Working Group</a>, which is part of the W3C Web Services Activity.</p>

<p>The previous version of this document was not a Candidate Recommendation. The document is moving directly from Last Call Announcement to Call for Review of a Proposed Recommendation. This change, which was referenced in the previous Status of this Document section, was made because the move back to Last Call was done mainly to change a namespace that was missing in the previous LC-CR move.</p>

<p>This document is based on the W3C Submission SOAP over Java(tm) Message Service 1.0. A list of changes is available in <a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/soapjms/#change-log">I Change Log</a>, and the status of issues raised since the previous version can be seen in the Working Group's <a href="http://dev.w3.org/2008/ws/soapjms/disposition-of-comments.html">disposition of comments document</a>.</p>

<p>The authors of this document consider it to be stable, and invite reviewers and implementors to send comments to the <a href="public-soap-jms@w3.org">public-soap-jms@w3.org</a> mailing list (<a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/">public archive</a>). Advisory Committee representatives may send their review comments using the <a href= QUESTION: what is the link to our WSB review form? >WBS review form</a> before the deadline of (QUESTION: what is the end of this review period?).</p>

<p>Publication as a Proposed Recommendation does not imply endorsement by the W3C Membership. This is a draft document and may be updated, replaced or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to cite this document as other than work in progress.</p>

<p> This document was produced by a group operating under the <a href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy-20040205/">5 February 2004 W3C Patent Policy</a>. W3C maintains a <a rel="disclosure" href="@@URI to IPP status or other page@@">public list of any patent disclosures</a> made in connection with the deliverables of the group; that page also includes instructions for disclosing a patent. An individual who has actual knowledge of a patent which the individual believes contains <a href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy-20040205/#def-essential">Essential Claim(s)</a> must disclose the information in accordance with <a href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy-20040205/#sec-Disclosure">section 6 of the W3C Patent Policy</a>. </p>

-----Original Message-----
From: Yves Lafon [mailto:ylafon@w3.org] 
Sent: Friday, September 16, 2011 4:02 AM
To: Rokicki, Derek
Cc: public-soap-jms@w3.org
Subject: Re: ACTION-253: proposal for new SOTD

On Mon, 29 Aug 2011, Rokicki, Derek wrote:

> Yves and group,
>
> Regarding ACTION-253, the following text is a proposal for the status of
> the document (SOTD) text.  Please review at your convenience (suggested
> changes are shown in red).
>
> Thank you,
> Derek
>
>
> Status of this Document
>
> This section describes the status of this document at the time of its
> publication. Other documents may supersede this document. A list of
> current W3C publications and the latest revision of this technical
> report can be found in the W3C technical reports index at
> http://www.w3.org/TR/.
>
> This is the Proposed Recommendation [hyperlink:
> http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#cfr] of the SOAP over
> Java Message Service 1.0 specification. It has been produced by the
> SOAP-JMS Binding Working Group, which is part of the W3C Web Services
> Activity.
>
> This document is based on the W3C Submission SOAP over Java(tm) Message
> Service 1.0. A list of changes is available in I Change Log, and the
> status of issues raised since the previous version can be seen in the
> Working Group's disposition to comments document.

Excellent, it would be good to add the latest disposition of comments as 
well, (or merge the two with a pointer at the top (of the Disposition of 
Comments document) to the differents review periods).

Also it should be noted somewhere that moving directly to PR was hinted in 
the previous document status section, as going back to Last-Call was 
mainly to change the namespace that was missing in the previous LC-CR move 
that got some conformance changes. (the last part might be dropped, but 
saying again that the LC->PR move was planned is important)

> A Proposed Recommendation does not imply endorsement by the W3C
> Membership. A Proposed Recommendation is a mature technical report that,
> after wide review for technical soundness and implementability, W3C has
> sent to the W3C Advisory Committee for final endorsement. This is a
> draft document and may be updated, replaced or obsoleted by other
> documents at any time. It is inappropriate to cite this document as
> other than work in progress.

In
http://dev.w3.org/2008/ws/soapjms/soapjms-2011-PR.html it still says WD 
instead of PR, in this paragraph.
Thanks,

> This document was produced by a group operating under the 5 February
> 2004 W3C Patent Policy. W3C maintains a public list of any patent
> disclosures made in connection with the deliverables of the group; that
> page also includes instructions for disclosing a patent. An individual
> who has actual knowledge of a patent which the individual believes
> contains Essential Claim(s) must disclose the information in accordance
> with section 6 of the W3C Patent Policy.
>

-- 
Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras.

         ~~Yves
Received on Tuesday, 27 September 2011 03:18:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 September 2011 03:18:51 GMT