W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-soap-jms@w3.org > October 2011

RE: ACTION-253: proposal for new SOTD

From: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2011 12:16:50 -0400 (EDT)
To: "Rokicki, Derek" <Derek.Rokicki@softwareag.com>
cc: public-soap-jms@w3.org
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.1110031152270.17426@wnl.j3.bet>
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011, Rokicki, Derek wrote:

> Yves,
>
> Here is an updated version of the Status of this Document section. This 
> version incorporates your suggestions and it is in conformance with the 
> Technical Report Publication Policy (almost).
>
> I still have a few questions...
>
> 1) SOTD must include the end date of the review period. What is this 
> date?

The WG should make a decision on the length of the review period. Note 
that PR is more a step to get an OK from the Advisory Committee than 
review from the public (although public comment is also welcomed).
At least 4 weeks is a practical minimum.

> 2) SOTD must include either: a link to an interoperability or 
> implementation report if the Director used such a report as part of the 
> decision to advance the specification, or a statement that the 
> Director's decision did not involve such a report. Do we have such a 
> report?
>
> 3) SOTD must provide information to Advisory Committee Representatives 
> about how to send their review comments (e.g., a link to a WBS review 
> form). What is the link to our WSB review form?

No need for a WBS here, just a link to the usual mailing list for 
comments. The WBS link will be sent to Advisory Committee Representatives, 
and you won't have to worry about that.

> <h2>Status of this Document</h2>
>
> <p>This section describes the status of this document at the time of its 
> publication. Other documents may supersede this document. A list of 
> current W3C publications and the latest revision of this technical 
> report can be found in the W3C technical reports index at <a 
> href="http://www.w3.org/TR/">http://www.w3.org/TR/</a>.</p>
>
> </p>This is the <a 
> href="http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#cfr">Proposed 
> Recommendation</a> of the SOAP over Java Message Service 1.0 
> specification. It has been produced by the <a href=" 
> http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/">SOAP-JMS Binding Working Group</a>, 
> which is part of the W3C Web Services Activity.</p>

The first </p> should be a <p>, but I think it was a typo.

> <p>The previous version of this document was not a Candidate 
> Recommendation. The document is moving directly from Last Call 
> Announcement to Call for Review of a Proposed Recommendation. This 
> change, which was referenced in the previous Status of this Document 
> section, was made because the move back to Last Call was done mainly to 
> change a namespace that was missing in the previous LC-CR move.</p>
>
> <p>This document is based on the W3C Submission SOAP over Java(tm) 
> Message Service 1.0. A list of changes is available in <a 
> href="http://www.w3.org/TR/soapjms/#change-log">I Change Log</a>, and 
> the status of issues raised since the previous version can be seen in 
> the Working Group's <a 
> href="http://dev.w3.org/2008/ws/soapjms/disposition-of-comments.html">disposition 
> of comments document</a>.</p>
>
> <p>The authors of this document consider it to be stable, and invite 
> reviewers and implementors to send comments to the <a 
> href="public-soap-jms@w3.org">public-soap-jms@w3.org</a> mailing list 
> (<a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/">public 
> archive</a>). Advisory Committee representatives may send their review 
> comments using the <a href= QUESTION: what is the link to our WSB review 
> form? >WBS review form</a> before the deadline of (QUESTION: what is the 
> end of this review period?).</p>
>
> <p>Publication as a Proposed Recommendation does not imply endorsement 
> by the W3C Membership. This is a draft document and may be updated, 
> replaced or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is 
> inappropriate to cite this document as other than work in progress.</p>
>
> <p> This document was produced by a group operating under the <a 
> href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy-20040205/">5 February 
> 2004 W3C Patent Policy</a>. W3C maintains a <a rel="disclosure" 
> href="@@URI to IPP status or other page@@">public list of any patent 
> disclosures</a> made in connection with the deliverables of the group; 
> that page also includes instructions for disclosing a patent. An 
> individual who has actual knowledge of a patent which the individual 
> believes contains <a 
> href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy-20040205/#def-essential">Essential 
> Claim(s)</a> must disclose the information in accordance with <a 
> href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy-20040205/#sec-Disclosure">section 
> 6 of the W3C Patent Policy</a>. </p>

Looks good to me, thanks!

>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yves Lafon [mailto:ylafon@w3.org]
> Sent: Friday, September 16, 2011 4:02 AM
> To: Rokicki, Derek
> Cc: public-soap-jms@w3.org
> Subject: Re: ACTION-253: proposal for new SOTD
>
> On Mon, 29 Aug 2011, Rokicki, Derek wrote:
>
>> Yves and group,
>>
>> Regarding ACTION-253, the following text is a proposal for the status of
>> the document (SOTD) text.  Please review at your convenience (suggested
>> changes are shown in red).
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Derek
>>
>>
>> Status of this Document
>>
>> This section describes the status of this document at the time of its
>> publication. Other documents may supersede this document. A list of
>> current W3C publications and the latest revision of this technical
>> report can be found in the W3C technical reports index at
>> http://www.w3.org/TR/.
>>
>> This is the Proposed Recommendation [hyperlink:
>> http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#cfr] of the SOAP over
>> Java Message Service 1.0 specification. It has been produced by the
>> SOAP-JMS Binding Working Group, which is part of the W3C Web Services
>> Activity.
>>
>> This document is based on the W3C Submission SOAP over Java(tm) Message
>> Service 1.0. A list of changes is available in I Change Log, and the
>> status of issues raised since the previous version can be seen in the
>> Working Group's disposition to comments document.
>
> Excellent, it would be good to add the latest disposition of comments as
> well, (or merge the two with a pointer at the top (of the Disposition of
> Comments document) to the differents review periods).
>
> Also it should be noted somewhere that moving directly to PR was hinted in
> the previous document status section, as going back to Last-Call was
> mainly to change the namespace that was missing in the previous LC-CR move
> that got some conformance changes. (the last part might be dropped, but
> saying again that the LC->PR move was planned is important)
>
>> A Proposed Recommendation does not imply endorsement by the W3C
>> Membership. A Proposed Recommendation is a mature technical report that,
>> after wide review for technical soundness and implementability, W3C has
>> sent to the W3C Advisory Committee for final endorsement. This is a
>> draft document and may be updated, replaced or obsoleted by other
>> documents at any time. It is inappropriate to cite this document as
>> other than work in progress.
>
> In
> http://dev.w3.org/2008/ws/soapjms/soapjms-2011-PR.html it still says WD
> instead of PR, in this paragraph.
> Thanks,
>
>> This document was produced by a group operating under the 5 February
>> 2004 W3C Patent Policy. W3C maintains a public list of any patent
>> disclosures made in connection with the deliverables of the group; that
>> page also includes instructions for disclosing a patent. An individual
>> who has actual knowledge of a patent which the individual believes
>> contains Essential Claim(s) must disclose the information in accordance
>> with section 6 of the W3C Patent Policy.
>>
>
>

-- 
Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras.

         ~~Yves
Received on Monday, 3 October 2011 16:16:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 3 October 2011 16:16:59 GMT