W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-soap-jms@w3.org > November 2011

Who do I send this to: Request to progress to Proposed Recommendation for SOAP-JMS

From: Eric Johnson <eric@tibco.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 16:25:52 +0100
Message-ID: <4EB94A00.1010408@tibco.com>
To: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
CC: SOAP-JMS <public-soap-jms@w3.org>
Hi Yves,

We voted to proceed to PR today. The following is the document I've 
prepared to send out.

Who do I send it to?

-Eric
======================================================================

Dear Colleagues,

The SOAP-JMS Working Group requests transition to Proposed 
Recommendation for the SOAP over Java Messaging Service 1.0 specification.

Document title
--------------
SOAP over Java Messaging Service 1.0

URLs
----
Draft: http://dev.w3.org/2008/ws/soapjms/soapjms-2011-PR.html
Final: http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/PR-soapjms-20111108/

Abstract
--------
The abstract can be found at:
http://dev.w3.org/2008/ws/soapjms/soapjms-2011-PR.html#abstract

Status
------
The status of the document can be found at:
http://dev.w3.org/2008/ws/soapjms/soapjms-2011-PR.html#status

Estimated publication date:
---------------------------
November 15, 2011

Records
-------
Decision to request the transition:
http://www.w3.org/2011/11/08-soap-jms-minutes.html

Significant Changes Since Previous Publication
----------------------------------------------
  * clarified text around the use of BytesMessage and TextMessage
  * added support for "contentEncoding"
  * improvements to non-normative text
  * miscellaneous editorial changes

For a complete report, see:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2011Oct/0006.html

as well as our disposition of comments, since all changes were tracked 
by issues:
http://dev.w3.org/2008/ws/soapjms/disposition-of-comments-2011-PR.html

Evidence That Documentation Satisfies Group's Requirements
----------------------------------------------------------
The background section of the document establishes what the document 
aims to define, and links to those portions of the specification:

http://dev.w3.org/2008/ws/soapjms/soapjms-2011-PR.html#introduction-background

Evidence that Dependencies Have Been Met
----------------------------------------
This specification has no normative dependency issues.

Evidence for Wide Review
------------------------
There exist at least four implementations, including at least one open 
source implementation. Comments arrived on our public mailing list from 
parties previously unknown to members of the WG.

Evidence that issues have been formally addressed
-------------------------------------------------
All issues raised on the public mailing list resulted in issues entered 
in our tracker, and all issues in the issue tracker have been addressed 
to the satisfaction of the person who raised the issue.

Specifically, you can see our disposition of comments since our last 
last public release:

http://dev.w3.org/2008/ws/soapjms/disposition-of-comments-2011-PR.html

Implementation Information
--------------------------
Three implementations have publicly stated that they pass the test suite 
defined by the working group.

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2011Aug/0002.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2011Oct/0008.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2011Apr/0003.html

... and from the Apache CXF project, over a sequence of emails ...
https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/cxf-dev/201104.mbox/%3C201104051045.04251.dkulp%40apache.org%3E
https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/cxf-dev/201104.mbox/%3C4DACB9C1.4080008%40tibco.com%3E
https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/cxf-dev/201104.mbox/%3C201104191250.00242.dkulp%40apache.org%3E

Objections
----------
None raised

Patent disclosures
------------------
None


Eric Johnson,
Chair, SOAP-JMS working group
Received on Tuesday, 8 November 2011 15:28:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 November 2011 15:28:14 GMT