W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-soap-jms@w3.org > November 2011

Re: Action-258: (Draft #2) Request to progress to Proposed Recommendation for SOAP-JMS

From: Mark Phillips <M8PHILLI@uk.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2011 14:47:56 +0000
To: Eric Johnson <eric@tibco.com>
Cc: SOAP-JMS <public-soap-jms@w3.org>
Message-ID: <OF75C07560.BF601F35-ON8025793C.004D2291-8025793C.00514B43@uk.ibm.com>
Yes, I'd be happy to update the document - and I'll go with 23rd December -
but in looking at the source I notice another unresolved question :

<a href="QUESTION: what is the link to our WSB review form?">

Rather than linking to a specific form I propose we use the same wording
that the SVG spec used for their Proposed Recommendation on 09 June 2011
[1].

Specifically  I propose we replace the text :

   Advisory Committee representatives may send their review comments using
   the WBS review form before the deadline of (QUESTION: what is the end of
   this review period?).

with the text :

   W3C Advisory Committee Members are invited to send formal review
   comments on this Proposed Recommendation to the W3C Team until 23
   December 2011.   Members of the W3C Advisory Committee will find the
   appropriate review form for this document by consulting their list of
   current WBS questionnaires.

Any objections / comments?

Regards
Mark


[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/PR-SVG11-20110609/




From:	Eric Johnson <eric@tibco.com>
To:	Mark Phillips/UK/IBM@IBMGB
Cc:	SOAP-JMS <public-soap-jms@w3.org>
Date:	02/11/2011 13:55
Subject:	Re: Action-258: (Draft #2) Request to progress to Proposed
            Recommendation for SOAP-JMS



Hi Mark,

I might suggest one additional week, at least, because the US has the
Thanksgiving holiday in the middle of that time frame.

Care to update the document?

-Eric.

On 11/2/11 2:42 PM, Mark Phillips wrote:
> Thanks Eric, I have reviewed this, and the disposition of comments and
both
> look good.
>
> One remaining item that I think we need to resolve is the paragraph in
the
> SOTD [1] which begins "The authors of this document consider it to be
> stable".  The paragraph ends with the question "(QUESTION: what is the
end
> of this review period?)."
>
> In his note on 3rd Oct [2] Yves suggested at least 4 weeks for this
review
> period - so does December 16th seem reasonable if we publish on November
> 15th.
>
> Regards
> Mark
>
> [1]   http://dev.w3.org/2008/ws/soapjms/soapjms-2011-PR.html#status
> [2]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2011Oct/0000.html
>
>
>
>
>
> From:		 Eric Johnson<eric@tibco.com>
> To:		 SOAP-JMS<public-soap-jms@w3.org>
> Date:		 01/11/2011 14:24
> Subject:		 Action-258: (Draft #2) Request to progress to Proposed
>              Recommendation  for SOAP-JMS
>
>
>
> SOAP-JMS WG - the following is my 2nd draft of the request to progress
> to PR, integrating feedback from Yves.
>
> Specifically, Yves noted that it would be appropriate to link to:
>    * a report of issues raised during our Last Call
>    * declarations of conformance by implementations.
>
> So I've done so.
>
> Further comments welcome!
>
> -Eric
> ======================================================================
>
> Dear Colleagues,
>
> The SOAP-JMS Working Group requests transition to Proposed
> Recommendation for the SOAP over Java Messaging Service 1.0
specification.
>
> Document title
> --------------
> SOAP over Java Messaging Service 1.0
>
> URLs
> ----
> Draft: http://dev.w3.org/2008/ws/soapjms/soapjms-2011-PR.html
> Final: http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/PR-soapjms-20111108/
>
> Abstract
> --------
> The abstract can be found at:
> http://dev.w3.org/2008/ws/soapjms/soapjms-2011-PR.html#abstract
>
> Status
> ------
> The status of the document can be found at:
> http://dev.w3.org/2008/ws/soapjms/soapjms-2011-PR.html#status
>
> Estimated publication date:
> ---------------------------
> November 15, 2011
>
> Records
> -------
> Decision to request the transition:
> (TBD)
>
> Significant Changes Since Previous Publication
> ----------------------------------------------
>    * clarified text around the use of BytesMessage and TextMessage
>    * added support for "contentEncoding"
>    * improvements to non-normative text
>    * miscellaneous editorial changes
>
> For a complete report, see:
> URL-TBD
>
> Evidence That Documentation Satisfies Group's Requirements
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> The background section of the document establishes what the document
> aims to define, and links to those portions of the specification:
>
>
http://dev.w3.org/2008/ws/soapjms/soapjms-2011-PR.html#introduction-background

>
>
> Evidence that Dependencies Have Been Met
> ----------------------------------------
> This specification has no normative dependency issues.
>
> Evidence for Wide Review
> ------------------------
> There exist at least four implementations, including at least one open
> source implementation. Comments arrived on our public mailing list from
> parties previously unknown to members of the WG.
>
> Evidence that issues have been formally addressed
> -------------------------------------------------
> All issues raised on the public mailing list resulted in issues entered
> in our tracker, and all issues in the issue tracker have been addressed
> to the satisfaction of the person who raised the issue.
>
> Specifically, you can see our disposition of comments since our last
> last public release:
>
> http://dev.w3.org/2008/ws/soapjms/disposition-of-comments-2011-PR.html
>
> Implementation Information
> --------------------------
> Three implementations have publicly stated that they pass the test suite
> defined by the WG.
>
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2011Aug/0002.html
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2011Oct/0008.html
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2011Apr/0003.html
>
> ... and from the Apache CXF project, over a sequence of emails ...
>
https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/cxf-dev/201104.mbox/%3C201104051045.04251.dkulp%40apache.org%3E

>
>
https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/cxf-dev/201104.mbox/%3C4DACB9C1.4080008%40tibco.com%3E

>
>
https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/cxf-dev/201104.mbox/%3C201104191250.00242.dkulp%40apache.org%3E

>
>
> Objections
> ----------
> None raised
>
> Patent disclosures
> ------------------
> None
>
>
> Eric Johnson,
> Chair, SOAP-JMS working group
>
>
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 2 November 2011 14:57:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 2 November 2011 14:57:43 GMT