W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-soap-jms@w3.org > November 2011

Re: Action-258: (Draft #2) Request to progress to Proposed Recommendation for SOAP-JMS

From: Eric Johnson <eric@tibco.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2011 14:55:16 +0100
Message-ID: <4EB14BC4.8000103@tibco.com>
To: Mark Phillips <M8PHILLI@uk.ibm.com>
CC: SOAP-JMS <public-soap-jms@w3.org>
Hi Mark,

I might suggest one additional week, at least, because the US has the 
Thanksgiving holiday in the middle of that time frame.

Care to update the document?

-Eric.

On 11/2/11 2:42 PM, Mark Phillips wrote:
> Thanks Eric, I have reviewed this, and the disposition of comments and both
> look good.
>
> One remaining item that I think we need to resolve is the paragraph in the
> SOTD [1] which begins "The authors of this document consider it to be
> stable".  The paragraph ends with the question "(QUESTION: what is the end
> of this review period?)."
>
> In his note on 3rd Oct [2] Yves suggested at least 4 weeks for this review
> period - so does December 16th seem reasonable if we publish on November
> 15th.
>
> Regards
> Mark
>
> [1]   http://dev.w3.org/2008/ws/soapjms/soapjms-2011-PR.html#status
> [2]   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2011Oct/0000.html
>
>
>
>
>
> From:	Eric Johnson<eric@tibco.com>
> To:	SOAP-JMS<public-soap-jms@w3.org>
> Date:	01/11/2011 14:24
> Subject:	Action-258: (Draft #2) Request to progress to Proposed
>              Recommendation  for SOAP-JMS
>
>
>
> SOAP-JMS WG - the following is my 2nd draft of the request to progress
> to PR, integrating feedback from Yves.
>
> Specifically, Yves noted that it would be appropriate to link to:
>    * a report of issues raised during our Last Call
>    * declarations of conformance by implementations.
>
> So I've done so.
>
> Further comments welcome!
>
> -Eric
> ======================================================================
>
> Dear Colleagues,
>
> The SOAP-JMS Working Group requests transition to Proposed
> Recommendation for the SOAP over Java Messaging Service 1.0 specification.
>
> Document title
> --------------
> SOAP over Java Messaging Service 1.0
>
> URLs
> ----
> Draft: http://dev.w3.org/2008/ws/soapjms/soapjms-2011-PR.html
> Final: http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/PR-soapjms-20111108/
>
> Abstract
> --------
> The abstract can be found at:
> http://dev.w3.org/2008/ws/soapjms/soapjms-2011-PR.html#abstract
>
> Status
> ------
> The status of the document can be found at:
> http://dev.w3.org/2008/ws/soapjms/soapjms-2011-PR.html#status
>
> Estimated publication date:
> ---------------------------
> November 15, 2011
>
> Records
> -------
> Decision to request the transition:
> (TBD)
>
> Significant Changes Since Previous Publication
> ----------------------------------------------
>    * clarified text around the use of BytesMessage and TextMessage
>    * added support for "contentEncoding"
>    * improvements to non-normative text
>    * miscellaneous editorial changes
>
> For a complete report, see:
> URL-TBD
>
> Evidence That Documentation Satisfies Group's Requirements
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> The background section of the document establishes what the document
> aims to define, and links to those portions of the specification:
>
> http://dev.w3.org/2008/ws/soapjms/soapjms-2011-PR.html#introduction-background
>
>
> Evidence that Dependencies Have Been Met
> ----------------------------------------
> This specification has no normative dependency issues.
>
> Evidence for Wide Review
> ------------------------
> There exist at least four implementations, including at least one open
> source implementation. Comments arrived on our public mailing list from
> parties previously unknown to members of the WG.
>
> Evidence that issues have been formally addressed
> -------------------------------------------------
> All issues raised on the public mailing list resulted in issues entered
> in our tracker, and all issues in the issue tracker have been addressed
> to the satisfaction of the person who raised the issue.
>
> Specifically, you can see our disposition of comments since our last
> last public release:
>
> http://dev.w3.org/2008/ws/soapjms/disposition-of-comments-2011-PR.html
>
> Implementation Information
> --------------------------
> Three implementations have publicly stated that they pass the test suite
> defined by the WG.
>
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2011Aug/0002.html
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2011Oct/0008.html
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2011Apr/0003.html
>
> ... and from the Apache CXF project, over a sequence of emails ...
> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/cxf-dev/201104.mbox/%3C201104051045.04251.dkulp%40apache.org%3E
>
> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/cxf-dev/201104.mbox/%3C4DACB9C1.4080008%40tibco.com%3E
>
> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/cxf-dev/201104.mbox/%3C201104191250.00242.dkulp%40apache.org%3E
>
>
> Objections
> ----------
> None raised
>
> Patent disclosures
> ------------------
> None
>
>
> Eric Johnson,
> Chair, SOAP-JMS working group
>
>
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 2 November 2011 13:58:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 2 November 2011 13:58:26 GMT