W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-soap-jms@w3.org > February 2011

Re: Agenda for the 2011-02-01 conference call

From: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 10:20:02 -0500 (EST)
To: Eric Johnson <eric@tibco.com>
cc: SOAP-JMS <public-soap-jms@w3.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.1102011009320.3238@wnl.j3.bet>
On Mon, 31 Jan 2011, Eric Johnson wrote:

> http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/actions/222 - Derek
> http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/actions/223 - Phil
> http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/actions/241 - Eric
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2011Jan/0017.html
>
> 6) Moving to PR (via CR? & LC)
> * Resolve issues, but then what next steps?

Resolve issues, have a Disposition of Comments document to keep track of 
all comments received during the first CR, then LC (status agreed or not 
by the issuer, etc..).
Then transition to CR, calling for implementations (see
http://services.w3.org/xslt?xmlfile=http://www.w3.org/2005/08/01-transitions.html&xslfile=http://www.w3.org/2005/08/transitions.xsl&docstatus=cr-tr 
). Of course, if all the tests and tests results are there, the transition 
might be to PR, and there should be extra documents, like interop report 
to prepare.

-- 
Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras.

         ~~Yves
Received on Tuesday, 1 February 2011 15:20:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 1 February 2011 15:20:04 GMT