- From: Mark Phillips <M8PHILLI@uk.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2011 12:49:47 +0000
- To: Eric Johnson <eric@tibco.com>, public-soap-jms@w3.org
Eric Good news about the move to PR, and many thanks for making those changes. I approve. Regards Mark From: Eric Johnson <eric@tibco.com> To: SOAP-JMS <public-soap-jms@w3.org> Date: 02/12/2011 10:47 Subject: Move to PR, with one caveat, PLEASE REVIEW We finally had a call yesterday with the appropriate parties, and we did get approval to proceed to PR, with one caveat. During the review it was pointed out to me that we did not flag the following as an assertion: "If the message is formatted as a JMS BytesMessage, then the sender and receiver MUST use the writeBytes() and readBytes() methods, respectively." I wrapped this in the appropriate "assert" XML, and tagged it Protocol-2073. The second concern is that this isn't tested by our test suite, nor is it marked as "untestable." I specifically touched these files: soapjms/soapjms-2011-PR.xml soapjms/soapjms.xml testcases/assertions/assertions.xsl soapjms/testcases/testcases/testcases.xml (The first two of the above to add the actual "assert" XML wrapper around the text that raised the issue. The XSL file I changed to output "untestable by test cases" when the test cases cannot test something. Finally, testcases.xml I updated to mark Protocol-2072 tested by three tests that are currently marked as using TextMessage.) I regenerated test assertions and the spec files, and I ended up touching the following as well: soapjms/ackcurrent.xml soapjms/ackold.xml soapjms/document-assertion-table.xml soapjms/soapjms-2010-10-CR.html soapjms/soapjms-2011-PR.html soapjms/soapjms-2011-PR.xml soapjms/soapjms.html soapjms/testcases/assertions/assertions.html soapjms/testcases/testcases/testcases.html You can inspect updated files via URL, for example: http://dev.w3.org/2008/ws/soapjms/soapjms-2011-PR.html http://dev.w3.org/2008/ws/soapjms/testcases/assertions/assertions.html http://dev.w3.org/2008/ws/soapjms/testcases/testcases/testcases.html Please let me know if you approve or disapprove of the changes. -Eric.
Received on Friday, 2 December 2011 12:57:13 UTC