W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-soap-jms@w3.org > June 2010

Proposal to resolve ISSUE-38

From: Eric Johnson <eric@tibco.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 16:25:40 -0700
Message-Id: <A9F9838F-9C68-4434-816B-3233539426E5@tibco.com>
To: SOAP-JMS <public-soap-jms@w3.org>
As per ACTION-178, I'm on the hook to propose a resolution to ACTION-178.

Here goes:

Section 1.4.1:
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2008/ws/soapjms/soapjms.html?content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8#XML_Namespaces

No changes proposed

Section 1.6 (Conformance) http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2008/ws/soapjms/soapjms.html?content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8#introduction-conformance

Remove item #3 from this list.

Section 3.1: http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2008/ws/soapjms/soapjms.html?content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8#wsdl-overview

Remove the sentence: "For information about SOAP bindings in WSDL 2.0 see [WSDL 2.0 Adjuncts]."

Section 3.3 (WSDL 2.0 Extensions Overview)
 - remove

Section 3.4.4 (Specifying Properties in WSDL 1.1)
 - change ports/endpoints --> "ports"

Section 3.5 (WSDL 2.0 Extensions Detail)
 - remove

Section 3.6 (Properties)
 - change "port/endpoint" to "port"

Section 3.6.1 (Relationship to the WSDL 2.0 component model) & 3.6.1.1
 - remove

Insert new Appendix D (Non-Normative) (before existing Appendix D):

New section D.1:
This section describes using WSDL 2.0 in conjunction with SOAP/JMS.  For information about SOAP bindings in WSDL 2.0 see [WSDL 2.0 Adjuncts].

New section D.2 WSDL 2.0 Extensions overview:
(Gets the content of the current section 3.3)

New section D.3 WSDL 2.0 Extension detail:
Same as existing section 3.5, except:

Strike the first two paragraphs/sentences:
"This section is normative"
"This section describes the optional feature..."
Add a paragraph at the beginning:
 "Due to insufficient testing by implementations, the working group chose to create this non-normative section that describes a WSDL 2.0 binding."

Replace the two "MUST" keywords in this section with "needs to", and replace the "SHOULD" with "ought to".

New section D.3.1 (Relationship to the WSDL 2.0 Component Model)
 - gets the contents of the existing 3.6.1 section

New section D.3.1.1 Precedence
 - gets the contents of the existing 3.6.1.1 section

This concludes my action item 178

-Eric.
Received on Monday, 14 June 2010 23:26:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 18 December 2010 18:16:24 GMT