- From: Mark Phillips <M8PHILLI@uk.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 18:00:18 +0100
- To: public-soap-jms@w3.org
We didn't start the Zakim agents today, so instead of appearing on the web, the minutes are included as the IRC log below. Regards Mark = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = (17:06:19) mphillip: chair: Eric (17:06:23) mphillip: Scribe: Mark (17:07:05) mphillip: Agenda: Informal agenda today: - open issues, actions, and status of IETF (17:07:19) mphillip: Topic: Actions (17:07:48) mphillip: http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/actions/open (17:08:00) mphillip: Mark: http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/actions/154 - no progress (17:09:04) mphillip: Mark: http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/actions/173 - contacted IBMer who recommended Mark Hapner (17:09:20) mphillip: Mark: Request sent to Mark Hapner - awaiting response (17:09:25) mphillip: close action-173 (17:09:25) ***trackbot attempting to close ACTION-173. (17:09:25) trackbot: ACTION-173 Enquire in IBM about who to contact amongst JMS contributors closed (17:09:37) mphillip: Peter: http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/actions/169 (17:09:43) mphillip: Peter: Complete (17:09:51) mphillip: close action-169 (17:09:52) ***trackbot attempting to close ACTION-169. (17:09:52) trackbot: ACTION-169 Apply resolutions for Issues 35-37 closed (17:10:02) mphillip: Peter: http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/actions/174 - complete (17:10:11) mphillip: close: action-174 (17:12:22) mphillip: Topic: Issues (17:12:29) mphillip: Peter: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2010Jun/0001.html (17:12:51) mphillip: Peter: Resolutions for issues 35-37 linked above (17:13:46) mphillip: Peter: 2 new tests for basic SOAP 1.2 functionality – one-way and two-way respectively 0101 0102 (17:15:34) eric: http://dev.w3.org/2008/ws/soapjms/testcases/testcases/testcases.html#test1003 (17:17:17) mphillip: Peter: 1003 introduces inconsistency between contentType and XML declaration fr force fault (17:19:23) mphillip: Eric: it would be worth explaining the test in the description - to point out the mismatch between the contentType header and the message (17:19:47) mphillip: action Peter to clarify the test description for test 1003 (17:19:48) ***trackbot noticed an ACTION. Trying to create it. (17:19:48) trackbot: Created ACTION-175 - Clarify the test description for test 1003 [on Peter Easton - due 2010-06-08]. (17:24:34) mphillip: RESOLUTION: All agree that Issue 35 should be closed (17:25:16) eric: http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/issues/36 (17:25:32) mphillip: RESOLUTION: All agree that Issue 36 should be closed (17:26:03) mphillip: http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/issues/37 (17:26:17) mphillip: RESOLUTION: All agree that Issue 37 should be closed (17:27:06) mphillip: TOPIC: IETF URI spec. (17:27:37) mphillip: Eric: We should wait to see if we get a response from Mark Hapner (17:30:05) mphillip: Also David Chappell (Phil also sent note through LinkedIn) (17:32:18) mphillip: Peter: Will look for a more current email address for Dave (he used to work for Sonic) (17:33:06) mphillip: Eric: awaiting response from a contact in Oracle (17:34:50) mphillip: we will wait until next week to see if we get any responses (17:35:46) mphillip: Topic: Issues (cont) (17:37:58) mphillip: Mark: Issue 34 - http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/issues/34 (17:38:17) mphillip: Mark: having a better defined fault subcode for SOAP 1.1 would be an improvement (17:40:33) eric: WS-Addressing: http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-ws-addr-soap-20060509/#id2270287 (17:41:09) eric: WS-I Basic Profile: http://ws-i.org/profiles/BasicProfile-1.2-WGD.html#SOAP_Custom_Fault_Codes (17:41:12) mphillip: Phil: In favour of following the model used by other spec.s but there doesn't appear to be consistency in SOAP 1.1 faults (17:43:11) peaston: http://specs.xmlsoap.org/ws/2005/02/sc/WS-SecureConversation.pdf. (17:49:19) mphillip: Phil: How would we expect people to retrieve the fault code?. (17:52:06) mphillip: Peter: Currently people would need to get the fault detail and then parse the details. If the proposal is approved they could determine the cause more simply with the getFaultCode (17:53:17) mphillip: action Peter to re-write the explicit proposal for Issue 34 (17:53:18) ***trackbot noticed an ACTION. Trying to create it. (17:53:18) trackbot: Created ACTION-176 - Re-write the explicit proposal for Issue 34 [on Peter Easton - due 2010-06-08]. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = NEW ACTIONS ACTION-175 Clarify the test description for test 1003 Peter Easton 2010-06-08 ACTION-176 Re-write the explicit proposal for Issue 34 Peter Easton 2010-06-08
Received on Tuesday, 1 June 2010 17:03:45 UTC