W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-soap-jms@w3.org > July 2010

ISSUE-44 (MAY assertion re: props definition): No need to say where a property MAY appear [SOAP-JMS Binding specification]

From: SOAP-JMS Binding Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 22:39:03 +0000
To: public-soap-jms@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1OYReR-0002Zo-Ex@otto.w3.org>

ISSUE-44 (MAY assertion re: props definition): No need to say where a property MAY appear [SOAP-JMS Binding specification]

http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/issues/44

Raised by: Eric Johnson
On product: SOAP-JMS Binding specification

>From email:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2010Jul/0013.html

For each of
 * jndiConnectionFactoryName
 * jndiInitialContextFactory
 * jndiURL
 * jndiContextParameter

We have the phrase: "MAY be specified in JMS URI, WSDL, or somewhere else in the
environment"

Two problems here:
 * Each declaration here is not flagged as an assertion
 * The assertion is fundamentally informative, rather than normative.  That the property can be specified in the URI or the WSDL follows from other parts of the specification.  That it can be specified in the environment derives from existing assertion Protocol-2001, which tells you to refer to the environment.

Proposal:
For these four properties, change the statement to read:
"Can be specified in the JMS URI, WSDL, or somewhere else in the environment."
Received on Monday, 12 July 2010 22:39:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 18 December 2010 18:16:24 GMT