- From: Mark Phillips <M8PHILLI@uk.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 20:46:48 +0000
- To: public-soap-jms@w3.org
To complete ACTION-236 [1] I have applied the proposed resolution for ISSUE-69 [2] to the bindings specification. The changes involved adding a new sentence to section 2.4, after the sentence... "The contents of the JMS Message body MUST be the SOAP payload as a JMS BytesMessage or TextMessage." ...which reads... "If the message is formatted as a JMS BytesMessage, then the sender and receiver MUST use the writeBytes() and readBytes() methods, respectively." The new version of the specification can be viewed here: http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2008/ws/soapjms/soapjms.html?rev=1.112&content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8&f=h#binding-message-body ...and the difference between the old and new version is here: http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2008/ws/soapjms/soapjms.xml.diff?r1=1.107&r2=1.108&f=h Regards Mark [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/actions/236 [2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/issues/69
Received on Tuesday, 21 December 2010 20:53:24 UTC