- From: Mark Phillips <M8PHILLI@uk.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2010 13:57:24 +0100
- To: public-soap-jms@w3.org
In response to ACTION-195 [1], I propose the following alternative
resolution to ISSUE-50 [2]
In section 2.5:
Remove the first sentence ("An instance of a binding to JMS conforming to
this binding specification MUST support the following message exchange
patterns") and the two bullets that follow it.
Move the third paragraph up ("In the case of SOAP 1.1 there is no formal
specification of Message Exchange Patterns. A conforming SOAP-JMS Binding
instance MUST support both the generic "request/response" and "one-way"
patterns and in the case of SOAP 1.1 are specified in this document.†") so
that it becomes the first paragraph in the section.
Note that this will delete the Protocol-2031 assertion which is redundant
(Protocol-2032 provides the equivalent assertion for SOAP 1.2 and
Protocol-2033 provides the equivalent assertion for SOAP 1.1).
This completes action 195.
[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/actions/195
[2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/issues/50
Received on Tuesday, 3 August 2010 12:58:13 UTC