W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-soap-jms@w3.org > February 2009

[SOAP-JMS] Last Call comment LC08

From: Roland Merrick <roland_merrick@uk.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 12:11:26 +0000
To: Dongbo Xiao <dongbo.xiao@oracle.com>
Cc: "Michael Chen" <MICHAEL.X.CHEN@oracle.com>, public-soap-jms@w3.org
Message-ID: <OFA9A4BBE8.3A0A93A4-ON80257553.0041C68F-80257553.0042F7D4@uk.ibm.com>
Greetings Dongbo, in your feedback you included the following comment 
which he have assigned the identifier: LC08 [1]. 

1. General Comments
The JMS URI Scheme spec defines there variants: ?jndi?, ?queue?, and ?
topic?. It is not clear whether all three variants have to be supported by 
a conforming implementation of the binding spec. If ?queue and ?topic? 
variant have to be supported as well, it would make sense to discuss the 
meaning of the relevant properties (for example, destinationName and 
replyToName) in the cases where the jms-variant is ?queue? or ?topic?. 

The description of the soapjms:lookupVariant in 2.2.1, Connection to a 
destination has been updated by adding "The jms-variant: jndi MUST be 
supported." The latest version of the editor draft includes the change 
[2]. 

Please confirm whether the change we have made satisfies the concern that 
you raised. 
 
[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/wiki/2009-01_LC_Comments#LC08
[2] 
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2008/ws/soapjms/soapjms.html?content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8#binding-connection

Regards, Roland






Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 
741598. 
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
Received on Wednesday, 4 February 2009 12:12:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 18 December 2010 18:16:20 GMT