Greetings Eric, no idea why the issue didn't get logged. . . but on the issue itself, but would I be correct to assume that you are referring to the elements in the soapjms namespace that are used with WSDL, e.g. <soapjms:deliveryMode>PERSISTENT</soapjms:deliveryMode> if so, then I agree that this needs to be addressed. Regards, Roland From: Eric Johnson <eric@tibco.com> To: "SOAP/JMS (list)" <public-soap-jms@w3.org> Date: 07/10/2008 19:52 Subject: Re: NEW ISSUE: No XML Schema describes the elements defined in the specification OK, so that's weird. According to the W3C site, sending an email with the format I used for this one will file an issue in the bug database, but nothing happened. See: http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/#issues Anyone know why that didn't work? -Eric. Eric Johnson wrote: > Description: Neither the current published working draft, nor the > editors draft defines an XML Schema description of the elements defined > in the specification. > > Proposal: Add Appendix B to specification, defining the XML Schema for > the new elements in the specification. > > -Eric. > Unless stated otherwise above: IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AUReceived on Tuesday, 14 October 2008 12:59:51 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 14 October 2008 12:59:51 GMT