W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-soap-jms@w3.org > November 2008

RE: SOAP over JMS

From: Phil Adams <phil_adams@us.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 20:41:57 -0600
To: <Sanjeev_Dokiburra@ibi.com>
Cc: public-soap-jms@w3.org, public-soap-jms-request@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF475A3CD3.A4F6C6F2-ON8625750C.000BF0E6-8625750C.000ED4AA@us.ibm.com>
Sanjeev,
The fact that the soap action value "looks" like an HTTP url is just a 
coincidence.  It doesn't  mean that it is related to the HTTP transport 
per se.    The soap action value is simply an identifier for the intended 
action (e.g. operation).
As for your second question, I assume you're referring to this from 
section 3.4.1 of the binding spec:
40       <wsdl11:port name="StockQuotePort_jms" 
binding="tns:StockQuoteSoapJMSBinding">
41           <wsdl11soap11:address location="jms:jndi:myQueue?
targetService=stockquote"/>
42       </wsdl11:port>

In this example, the targetService property indicates the name of the port 
component which is the target of the request.







From:
<Sanjeev_Dokiburra@ibi.com>
To:
Phil Adams/Austin/IBM@IBMUS
Cc:
<public-soap-jms@w3.org>, <public-soap-jms-request@w3.org>
Date:
11/24/2008 04:34 PM
Subject:
RE: SOAP over JMS



Phil,
 
I would be glad if someone from the group could answer below questions.
 
1)      I am wondering about   the presence of http in SOAP Action 
attribute.  For JMS transport,  do we need to have  http action ?
25         <wsdl11soap11:operation soapAction="
http://example.com/GetLastTradePrice"/> 
 
2)      What does last parameter (after ?) in address location stands for 
?
 
 
Thanks & Rgds,
Sanjeev
From: Phil Adams [mailto:phil_adams@us.ibm.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 10:47 AM
To: Dokiburra, Sanjeev
Cc: public-soap-jms@w3.org; public-soap-jms-request@w3.org
Subject: RE: SOAP over JMS
 

Hi Sanjeev, 
Well, I certainly wouldn't want to be in a position to have to implement 
all the SOAP processing from scratch.   Have you looked into the use of 
one of the open source engines, such as Axis2, etc.?    In fact, I think 
Axis2 already has some sort of SOAP/JMS implementation, although I don't 
know if it supports the SOAP/JMS binding spec just yet. 




From: 
<Sanjeev_Dokiburra@ibi.com> 
To: 
Phil Adams/Austin/IBM@IBMUS 
Cc: 
<public-soap-jms@w3.org>, <public-soap-jms-request@w3.org> 
Date: 
11/19/2008 09:32 AM 
Subject: 
RE: SOAP over JMS
 




Hi Phil, 
  
Thank you very much for the response.  It was my mistake that I did not 
put up my question in right way.   In fact my component should do both 
functions i.e SOAP sending node & SOAP receiving node.  At this moment I 
am stuck with SOAP sending node implementation of constructing SOAP 
request message based on any given WSDL.  It would be really helpful if 
you can post a sample pseudo code(with respect to any existing soap/jms 
WSDL, to connect & test as well) for SOAP sending node implementation. 
Appreciate your time. 
  
Rgds, 
Sanjeev 
From: Phil Adams [mailto:phil_adams@us.ibm.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 10:16 AM
To: Dokiburra, Sanjeev
Cc: public-soap-jms@w3.org; public-soap-jms-request@w3.org
Subject: Re: SOAP over JMS 
  

Hi Sanjeev, 
It sounds like you are implementing (more or less) the "SOAP receiving 
node" as described in the SOAP/JMS binding spec.   Note that the WSDL 
binding section of the spec really doesn't apply to the SOAP receiving 
node, since the WSDL is used by the client runtime (SOAP sending node) to 
construct the request message.    So you basically just need to receive 
the JMS message off the queue or topic, then use the JMS message 
properties (e.g. SOAPJMS_contentType) along with the body of the message 
(the format of the body will be described by the SOAPJMS_contentType 
property value) to de-serialize the request.   Then you would process the 
request and construct a response message and send it back in a JMS message 
according to the rules laid out by the SOAP/JMS binding spec.    The 
hardest part (IMO) is the message de-serialization step, although the code 
used to do that would basically be the same that's used to de-serialize a 
message received via HTTP so if your component already supports HTTP, then 
you are mostly done :) 

Regards, 



From: 
<Sanjeev_Dokiburra@ibi.com> 
To: 
<public-soap-jms@w3.org> 
Date: 
11/19/2008 02:43 AM 
Subject: 
SOAP over JMS

 
 





Team, 
 
I am developing a standalone component, which would pick soap/jms message 
from a destination, processes it (webservice call) and then returns the 
response to reply destination.  Could you please give me pointers about 
java implementation by looking at WSDL.  Wondering whether it would be 
normal http webservice rpc/document invocation using soapaction mentioned 
in line-25, after picking up request message.  Any help is appreciated. 
 
<wsdl11:binding name="StockQuoteSoapJMSBinding" 
type="tns:StockQuotePortType" 
             xmlns:soapjms="http://www.w3.org/2008/07/soap/bindings/JMS/"> 

15       <wsdl11soap11:binding style="document" 
             transport="http://www.w3.org/2008/07/soap/bindings/JMS/"/> 
16 
17       <!-- We want this binding to use a particular CF class --> 
18       <soapjms:jndiConnectionFactoryName> 
19         sample.jms.ConnectionFactory 
20       </soapjms:jndiConnectionFactoryName> 
21       <!-- Specify PERSISTENT delivery mode --> 
22       <soapjms:deliveryMode>PERSISTENT</soapjms:deliveryMode> 
23 
24       <wsdl11:operation name="GetLastTradePrice"> 
25         <wsdl11soap11:operation soapAction="
http://example.com/GetLastTradePrice"/> 
26         <wsdl11:input> 
27             <wsdl11soap11:body use="literal"/> 
28         </wsdl11:input> 
29         <wsdl11:output> 
30             <wsdl11soap11:body use="literal"/> 
31          </wsdl11:output> 
32       </wsdl11:operation> 
33   </wsdl11:binding> 
 
 
Thanks & Rgds, 
Sanjeev 



picture
(image/gif attachment: 01-part)

picture
(image/gif attachment: 02-part)

picture
(image/gif attachment: 03-part)

Received on Tuesday, 25 November 2008 02:42:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 18 December 2010 18:16:19 GMT