On Wed, 29 Oct 2008, Roland Merrick wrote: > Greetings, I have most of the Editorial updates to the spec agreed during > yesterday's call. If you are still reviewing please use the latest draft > [1]. > > Still to do: > > update reference to latest URI draft once Eric has submitted it. > get "the question" to reviewers into the Status of Document section > I have inserted the question into "2.2 Properties Affecting > Binding" > the status section seems to be generated. > Yves, how do I include the request to reviewers in the Status section? The ideal is th have an ednote in the body of the spec (like you did), and in the status section, something like. << The Working Group seeks opinion on the question about [precedence of properties described in section 2.2 (link to the ednote)]. >> as a standalone paragraph to isolate it from more "boilerplate-grade" paragraphs. > > [1] > http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2008/ws/soapjms/soapjms.html?content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8 > [2] > http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2008/ws/soapjms/soapjms.html?content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8#binding-properties > > Regards, Roland > > > > > > Unless stated otherwise above: > IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number > 741598. > Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU > > > > > > -- Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras. ~~YvesReceived on Tuesday, 4 November 2008 10:28:09 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 4 November 2008 10:28:10 GMT