W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-soap-jms@w3.org > December 2008

[Fwd: [rt.amsl.com #12047] JMS URI Scheme submission]

From: Eric Johnson <eric@tibco.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2008 11:14:41 -0800
Message-ID: <493437A1.2080409@tibco.com>
To: "SOAP/JMS (list)" <public-soap-jms@w3.org>

FYI - a response back from the IETF secretary mailing list.

Haven't spent time thinking about which option is best to pursue.

-Eric.

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: 	[rt.amsl.com #12047] JMS URI Scheme submission
Date: 	Mon, 01 Dec 2008 11:06:47 -0800
From: 	Cindy Morgan via RT <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
Reply-To: 	iesg-secretary@ietf.org
To: 	eric@tibco.com
References: 	<RT-Ticket-12047@rt.amsl.com> <4931D2FB.4010209@tibco.com>



Hi Eric,

It looks like this is an independent submission outside of an IETF
working group.  In that case, you have few options.

1) If you think this work relates to work going on in one of the IETF's
working groups, you can approach the chair and ask about having your
draft adopted as a working group submission.  (A list of IETF working
groups is available at http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/wg-dir.html.) 

2) You can approach one of the IESG Area Directors and ask them to
shepherd your document through the standards process as an individual
submission.  IESG members are listed at http://www.ietf.org/IESGmems.html.

3) You can submit your draft directly to the RFC Editor
(rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org) for publication.  For information on how to
make an independent submission, please see the RFC Editor web site at
http://www.rfc-editor.org/indsubs.html.

More general information about the RFC Publication process is available
at http://www.rfc-editor.org/howtopub.html.

Best regards,
Cindy




On Sat Nov 29 15:40:55 2008, eric@tibco.com wrote:
> To whom it may concern,
> 
> Being somewhat naive about the process by which a URI scheme might be
> accepted, I think I've hit upon the fact that I'm supposed to email this
> address requesting the start of the process for getting our "jms" URI
> scheme draft published as an RFC (if that's even the right terminology,
> and the right way to think about it?)
> 
> The data tracker link is here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/draft-merrick-jms-uri/
> 
> And the latest draft is:
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-merrick-jms-uri-05.txt
> 
> Please advise as to the next steps....  Thanks.
> 
> Sincerely,
> Eric Johnson.
> 
Received on Monday, 1 December 2008 19:15:16 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 18 December 2010 18:16:19 GMT