W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sml@w3.org > November 2009

Fw: [Bug 6015] [schema11] valid (and its derivations) vs assessment as used in text

From: John Arwe <johnarwe@us.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 10:30:12 -0500
To: public-sml@w3.org
Message-ID: <OFBB16807A.3E139671-ON85257662.0054E33F-85257662.00552C3D@us.ibm.com>
The Schema wg has decided on a resolution to another of the bugs against 
Schema 1.1 endorsed by the SML working group.
If you have any objections to this resolution, please make them known 
within the SML wg by end of day Thursday Nov 5.
In the absence of any objections, I will inform the Schema wg that the SML 
wg has consensus to accept their resolution and will close the bug to 
signal that (according to their process).

Best Regards, John

TACCT: Simplicity is ultimate sophistication 
                                        -- Leonardo da Vinci
Street address: 2455 South Road, P328 Poughkeepsie, NY USA 12601
Voice: 1+845-435-9470      Fax: 1+845-432-9787
----- Forwarded by John Arwe/Poughkeepsie/IBM on 11/02/2009 10:27 AM -----

From:
bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
To:
John Arwe/Poughkeepsie/IBM@IBMUS
Date:
10/30/2009 05:00 PM
Subject:
[Bug 6015] [schema11] valid (and its derivations) vs assessment as used in 
text



http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6015


C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
           Keywords|needsReview                 |resolved
         Resolution|                            |FIXED




--- Comment #6 from C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com> 
2009-10-30 20:59:52 ---
The wording proposal mentioned in comment 5 was adopted, with amendments, 
by
the XML Schema WG in its call today.  The amendments had the form of (a)
adopting version B of the definitions of document validity, (b) moving 
them out
of section 2.1 into a new section 2.4 on Schema-validity and documents, 
and
making a few smaller changes.  The resulting form of the proposal (after
amendment) can be seen (intermingled with the change for bug 7913, which 
is
unrelated but which was also approved today) at 

  http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/06/xmlschema-1/structures.nsq.html
  (member-only link; content subject to change, though none expected soon)

With this change the WG believes this issue has been resolved.

John, as the originator of the issue, please accept our thanks for holding 
our
feet to the fire to make us clean this up.  Then please communicate the
disposition to the SML WG, consider whether you and they are satisified 
with
the WG's consideration and disposition of your comment, and indicate
satisfaction by closing the issue or dissatisfaction by reopening it, in 
the
usual way.  If we don't hear from you in the next two weeks we will assume 
that
both you and the SML WG are satisfied.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You reported the bug.
Received on Monday, 2 November 2009 15:30:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 2 November 2009 15:30:57 GMT