W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sml@w3.org > March 2009

Re: action-210 namespace document review

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 17:17:27 +0100
To: John Arwe <johnarwe@us.ibm.com>
Cc: public-sml@w3.org
Message-ID: <f5btz5b2dew.fsf@hildegard.inf.ed.ac.uk>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

More seriously, I would say that improving the style and language of
these documents is only worth the effort for the namespace documents
resident in

  http://www.w3.org/ns

I would suggest that only errors of fact are worth correcting in the
stale documents.

This amounts to restricting ourselves to your

C5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 13, 15, 16, 17, 18 (I presume the missing C16 against
ns/sml.htlm is _your_ typo, as that is the _same_ document as ns/sml!)

C10, C11, C14 have been fixed

ht
- -- 
       Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
                         Half-time member of W3C Team
      10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
                Fax: (44) 131 651-1426, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                       URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFJ0PCXkjnJixAXWBoRAlhxAJ9s1pLZ/kWZQi00DJi62p3ubOm3ugCfad4k
JrkYMOQMbRV+51IHWzC0lFM=
=YgOo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Monday, 30 March 2009 16:18:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 30 March 2009 16:18:06 GMT