W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sml@w3.org > March 2009

RE: action 210 : review of namespace documents

From: Wilson, Kirk D <Kirk.Wilson@ca.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 06:54:42 -0400
Message-ID: <F9576E62032243419E097FED5F0E75F3062A1E89@USILMS12.ca.com>
To: <public-sml@w3.org>
In the 2008/09 set of documents:

 

I did not have permission to access the following documents that were
listed in the RDDL documents when dereferencing the preferred namespace
URIs:

http://www.w3.org/2008/11/sml-schema.xsd

http://www.w3.org/2008/11/sml-if-schema.xsd

 

The following URI provided on the sml-err.html (in the 2008/09) page did
not resolve:

http://www.w3.org/2008/12/sml-schema.xsd

 

The sml-function.html refers to the SML-IF spec as the spec in which the
sml-function namespace is defined; however, the N.B.-paragraph correctly
identifies the source document as SML.

 

 

Kirk Wilson, Ph.D.

Research Staff Member, CA Labs

603 823-7146 (preferred)

Cell:  603 991-8873

 

This e-mail may contain information that is privileged or confidential.
If you are not the intended recipient of this communication, please
delete this e-mail and notify the sender immediately.

From: public-sml-request@w3.org [mailto:public-sml-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Kumar Pandit
Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2009 8:45 PM
To: public-sml@w3.org
Subject: action 210 : review of namespace documents

 

I looked at the documents. All except the following look ok.

 

n  http://www.w3.org/2007/08/smlif

o    Text in the first paragraph should say SML-IF (instead of SML).

 

 
Received on Wednesday, 25 March 2009 10:55:46 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 25 March 2009 10:55:47 GMT