- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2009 05:02:56 +0000
- To: public-sml@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5341
--- Comment #34 from Len Charest <len.charest@microsoft.com> 2009-06-01 05:02:55 ---
Running the link checker (http://validator.w3.org/checklink) over revision 1.14
reveals many broken links, particularly links to the SML and SML-IF
recommendations. Many of the intra-doc fragment ids are broken as well.
In the References section:
- The [SML] and [SML-if] entries have '25 November 2008' as the date of
publication
- [RFC 3987] could use a comma and space after the title
- [WS-Man] -- There is a problem with the markup around the title
- [WS-T] and [WSDM] -- Replace period after title with a comma
- [XML] contains what looks like a placeholder '[XXXSMLXXX]'; also, is
the explanatory text re editions necessary here?
Suggest bumping up the date on the Note and adjusting the Note URIs to match. I
changed the XLink Note to '1 June 2006'.
The hover-to-reveal behavior of the 'Back to Contents' links is broken.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 1 June 2009 05:03:02 UTC