RE: please respond before telecon

#1 - ok
#2 - ok
#3 - in general, ok. But what are the 'indicated tests' (besides row 26)? Also row 26 should say "derefNV". We don't have any implementation to test this, right? - since both are validators.

--
ginny

From: public-sml-request@w3.org [mailto:public-sml-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of John Arwe
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2009 5:05 AM
To: public-sml@w3.org
Subject: please respond before telecon


http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sml/2009Jan/0022.html requests feedback on several issues that we should be able to get a read on before the next telecon, under "Changes still needed"

1. Anyone not ok with solving the "optional feature" expected results by documenting two expected results, one for implementations supporting the feature and one for those not supporting it?

2. Anyone not ok with keeping the new tests (rows 144-152) that COSMOS added in response to SML's requests, and that Kumar has now run?

3. DerefNV - Anyone not ok with updating the feature description to indicate that the indicated tests count as testing it?

Best Regards, John

Street address: 2455 South Road, P328 Poughkeepsie, NY USA 12601
Voice: 1+845-435-9470      Fax: 1+845-432-9787