See also: IRC log
<johnarwe_> *blush* seems I forgot to hit Send on this Friday. My bad.
<johnarwe_> If anyone is uncomfortable proceeding, since it was not posted 1 business
<johnarwe_> day in advance of the call,
<johnarwe_> we will skip this week.
<scribe> Scribe: Len Charest
<scribe> Scribenick: lencharest
Attendees agree to proceed with the meeting despite not having the agenda available prior to the meeting.
RESOLUTION: Minutes approved
<scribe> ACTION: Len to repost corrected minutes of 3/30 meeting [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/04/13-sml-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-219 - Repost corrected minutes of 3/30 meeting [on Len Charest - due 2009-04-20].
<johnarwe_> Telecon of 2009-04-13: fix as proposed, editors to incorporate section number of original text, and license given for editorial cleanup. No need for further wg review was expressed.
RESOLUTION: fix as proposed, editors to incorporate section number of original text, and license given for editorial cleanup.
Kirk: Re issue #2, are there targets for "local name" and "namespace name" in the Infoset spec?
<johnarwe_> compare with http://www.w3.org/TR/sml-if/#Base_URI
Len: No. And it seems to me that sending the reader to a definition of attribute information item is confusing.
<johnarwe_> (for Ginny) see http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6805 1st comment item 2
John: Treatment of [base URI] is different.
... Suggest we let the editors work this out.
Len: Or remove the square brackets and link to the definition in XML Namespaces.
John: The intent was to refer to the Infoset properties.
<johnarwe_> SML 4.3.1 is itself inconsistent: Len's citing of [ns] etc vs 2.a.ii.A handling of base uri
<johnarwe_> Is this what you mean? SML 4.3.1 item 1: An SML reference is identified as an instance of the SML URI Reference Scheme if and only if exactly one [element information] item whose local name is uri and whose namespace name is http://www.w3.org/ns/sml is present as a child of that reference element.
<johnarwe_> where [elem info item] hyperlinks to infoset spec
Len: Not quite. Here's my suggestion:
... "1.An SML reference is identified as an instance of the SML URI Reference Scheme if and only if exactly one element information item [XML Information Set] whose [local name] is uri and whose [namespace name] is http://www.w3.org/ns/sml is present as a child of that reference element."
... where [XML Information Set] is hyperlinked in the same way it appears in 2.a.ii.A and [local name] and [namespace name] are not.
RESOLUTION: (bug 6805 issue 2) Text in 4.3.1, item 1 shall be modified as shown above.
John: Any objections to the other issues in the bug -- i.e., cite tag and missing period?
<johnarwe_> 2009-04-13 telecon, see minutes for update to part 2. 1,3 approved. no need for further wg review expressed.
RESOLUTION: Issues 1 & 3 approved. No need for further wg review expressed.
John: Any objection to editors updating references using Henry's wording?
Len: The wording in the last sentence does not include a modification the WG previously approved.
<johnarwe_> Is the suggestion there from Len the revision you folks are talking about?
Len: Yes that is the revision.
John: Any objections to the proposal from 3/30 as amended by Len, at the link above?
No objections noted. RESOLUTION: Adopt the change in wording as above.
John: I'll open a bug to track this change.
Updated after meeting: Bug 6806created
Kirk: References need to be updated and doc converted to HTML.
... Final draft will be available May 4th.
Len: Latest draft in CVS includes all approved content changes.
Kirk: References in the Notes should use the same wording as SML/SML-IF specs.
Last Scribe Date Member Name Regrets pending 2008-05-22 Lynn, James Until further notice 2009-01-08 Smith, Virginia First half of Mondays (probably scribe-exempt) 2009-01-15 Gao, Sandy Second half of Mondays (probably scribe-exempt) 2009-03-23 Pandit, Kumar 2009-04-06 Wilson, Kirk 4/20 5/4 2008-04-13 Charest, Len Exempt Arwe, John Exempt Henry Thompson 4/13