W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sml@w3.org > April 2009

Re: References to XML in SML specs

From: John Arwe <johnarwe@us.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 09:01:08 -0400
To: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
Cc: public-sml@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF5A579DC3.2AA7A67E-ON85257592.004736B9-85257592.004784A3@us.ibm.com>
> What does it mean for a processor to 'support' both 4e and 5e?  That
> it both rejects and does not reject a document with 5e-only names?

I believe the presumption was that unspecified mechanisms (content 
sniffing, run time options being two examples) would be used to select the 
set of rules actually employed at run time.  To paraphrase using Schema 
language since SML lacks precise equivalent terms, a given SML assessment 
episode would use either 4e rules or 5e rules.  This is analogous to the 
Schema 1.1 language around using 1.0 vs 1.1 for XML and XML Namespaces, as 
I understand it.

Best Regards, John

TACCT: Simplicity is ultimate sophistication 
                                        -- Leonardo da Vinci
Street address: 2455 South Road, P328 Poughkeepsie, NY USA 12601
Voice: 1+845-435-9470      Fax: 1+845-432-9787
Received on Wednesday, 8 April 2009 13:01:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:56:15 UTC